CAMBRIDGE, MA — On the eve of Steve Bannon’s visit to nearby Harvard University over 300 MIT faculty and counting have taken a public stand…
Washington, DC — Today, Chelsea Manning’s legal defense team released a letter sent to the U.S. Army and the Office of the Pardon Attorney, requesting the commutation of Ms. Manning’s 35 year court-martial sentence to time served and “a first chance to live a real, meaningful life.” The letter discusses the harsh and inhumane conditions Ms. Manning was subjected to in unlawful pretrial solitary confinement for nearly a year.
Specifically, the application highlights the 11 months that Ms. Manning spent in solitary confinement before her trial. The first two months of that confinement was spent in the dark, in a cage inside of a tent, in 105 degree temperatures, in Kuwait. Following her confinement in Kuwait, Ms. Manning spent the next nine months of solitary confinement forced to sit upright, staring straight ahead at the wall, all day, every day.
View the full clemency letter sent to the Secretary of the Army and the Pardon Attorney for the President HERE
“After accepting full responsibility for her choices, Ms. Manning was sentenced to the most severe punishment received by any other whistleblower in American history, so excessive that it even exceeds international legal norms,” said attorney Vince Ward, one of the lawyers representing Chelsea in her appeal of her court martial.. “President Obama has the opportunity to right this wrong and commute her sentence to time served and we hope that he’ll give Chelsea a chance to live her life after her courageous act to raise public awareness about the impact of war on innocent civilians.”
“Chelsea was bullied in the Army because she is transgender and she has faced ongoing abuses and the denial of health care since her incarceration,” said Chase Strangio, an attorney representing Chelsea Manning in her civil case against the Department of Defense. “For years she served under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and then the ban on open transgender service and she has fought to exist as the woman that she is; she deserves to be free and given the health care that she needs, not punished.”
View the newly-launched petition here: http://tinyurl.com/chelseatimeserved
Manning supporters also launched a petition on the WeThePeople platform, calling for President Obama to act now to commute Chelsea’s sentence. Evan Greer, campaign director at Fight for the Future, a digital rights group that has supported Chelsea while in prison, said, “Chelsea Manning has suffered unimaginable abuses at the hands of the U.S. government, all for trying to help people and do the right thing. Unless President Obama acts now to release her, the government’s persecution of Chelsea will go down in history as one of the darkest and most shameful misdeeds of this administration.”
In their amicus brief, the Open Society Justice Initiative argues that the 35-year sentence imposed on Ms. Manning far exceeds international legal norms and should be reduced. Drawing on a survey of law and practice in 30 countries, it notes that Ms. Manning’s sentence is “far higher than the penalties that our closest allies would consider proportionate.” In the U.K, for example, the crimes of which Ms. Manning was found guilty carry a maximum penalty of 2 years in jail.
Chelsea wrote about her time in solitary confinement for The Guardian, in May 2016.
For interviews with the Chelsea Manning defense team, please contact Christina DiPasquale, 202.716.1953 or firstname.lastname@example.org
NEW YORK — Local officials in 11 cities announced today that they are launching legislative efforts to bring transparency to the acquisition and use of local police surveillance technologies for the first time. The measures include mandating explicit city council approval and a public hearing process that maximizes community input into surveillance technology decisions. This locally-led, multi-city effort was developed in partnership with 17 highly-diverse national partner organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Campaign Zero, and the Tenth Amendment Center.
In the rare cases where local police data has been available to the public — in cities like Baltimore, Maryland; Oakland, California; and Lansing, Michigan — the data has shown a disproportionate use of surveillance technologies in communities of color and low-income areas. The partner organizations have created a set of guiding principles to assist community groups in changing surveillance practices. The principles aim to promote transparency, democratic decision making, and community empowerment with respect to if and how surveillance technologies are funded, acquired, and used.
The first wave of cities announcing legislative efforts today are:
Miami Beach, Florida
New York, New York
Palo Alto, California
“The use of surveillance by local police has been spreading unchecked across the country without regard for the communities that they purport to serve,” said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union. “Today communities and their local elected officials are taking action to address the disparate impact, financial burden, and threats to civil rights and liberties posed by invasive surveillance technologies.”
“Local police surveillance technologies, which are disproportionately focused on African Americans and other people of color, are hurting our communities and undercutting the trust necessary for law enforcement to be effective. These technologies are invading our public spaces and creating a culture of fear,” said Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP’s Washington Bureau and its senior vice president for advocacy and policy. “We need to maximize the active engagement and influence our local communities have over surveillance technology decision-making. This first wave of legislative efforts being taken today across the country is a critical first step to moving local surveillance out of the shadows, ensuring transparency and accountability, and protecting the civil rights of all Americans.”
“People of color have long been the targets of government surveillance — but today’s technology makes it more concerning than ever,” said Alvaro Bedoya, founder and executive director of the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown University Law Center. “Communities are being confronted with the very real possibility that law enforcement is tracking them wherever they go — at work, school, places of worship and political gatherings. People need to feel safe in their neighborhoods, and this new effort is an important step in the process of taking back control.”
This surge of legislative action, which is expected to be replicated in an increasing number of cities across the nation, is guided by the following principles:
- Surveillance technologies should not be funded, acquired, or used without express city council approval.
- Local communities should play a significant and meaningful role in determining if and how surveillance technologies are funded, acquired, or used.
- The process for considering the use of surveillance technologies should be transparent and well-informed.
- The use of surveillance technologies should not be approved generally; approvals, if provided, should be for specific technologies and specific, limited uses.
- Surveillance technologies should not be funded, acquired, or used without addressing their potential impact on civil rights and civil liberties.
- Surveillance technologies should not be funded, acquired, or used without considering their financial impact.
- To verify legal compliance, surveillance technology use and deployment data should be reported publically on an annual basis.
- City council approval should be required for all surveillance technologies and uses; there should be no “grandfathering” for technologies currently in use.
The national partners in this effort are:
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
Bill of Rights Defense Committee/Defending Dissent Foundation
Center for Democracy & Technology
Center for Popular Democracy
Council on American–Islamic Relations (CAIR)
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Fight for the Future
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Million Hoodies Movement for Justice
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
National Network of Arab American Communities
Restore the Fourth
South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT)
Tenth Amendment Center
Additional resources and information can be found here: www.communityCTRL.com
San Diego, CA — This morning in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Joseph Buddenberg was sentenced to two years in federal prison for Conspiracy to Violate the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. The sentencing follows his signing a non-cooperating plea agreement in which he plead guilty to conspiring to free thousands of animals from fur farms throughout the U.S. and to cause damage to businesses associated with the fur industry.…
Chicago, IL — The following is a statement from Assata’s Daughters on their victory in #ByeAnita campaign:
“Chicago Black youth have kicked Anita Alvarez out of office. Just a month ago, Anita Alvarez was winning in the polls. Communities who refuse to be killed, jailed, and abused without any chance at justice refused to allow her to be re-elected as State’s Attorney.
“We did this for Rekia…
“We did this for Laquan…
“We won’t stop until we’re free and Kim Foxx should know that as well.”
About Assata’s Daughters
Assata’s Daughters is an intergenerational collective of Black women and girls. This demographic represents both the largest growing prison population and those leading protests against state violence in Chicago.