BREAKING: Joseph Buddenberg Sentenced to 2 Years in Federal Prison in Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act Case

[San Diego, CA] This morning in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Joseph Buddenberg was sentenced to two years in federal prison for Conspiracy to Violate the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. The sentencing follows his signing a non-cooperating plea agreement in which he plead guilty to conspiring to free thousands of animals from fur farms throughout the U.S. and to cause damage to businesses associated with the fur industry.


“Today’s sentencing must be understood in the context of the complete illegitimacy of the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act,” said Rachel Meeropol, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, and the lead lawyer on several constitutional challenges to the law.  “This is a law bought and paid for by corporations that profit from the exploitation of animals, in the service of nothing but their own bottom line. Prosecuting non-violent liberation of animals as ‘terrorism’ is a transparent attempt to silence an entire movement. The AETA violates fundamental constitutional principles of free speech and due process, and we will continue to challenge it wherever it is used. ”

Buddenberg and his co-defendant Nicole Kissane were indicted under the AETA last July. Earlier this year, both signed non-cooperating plea agreements; Kissane’s sentencing hearing is scheduled for June.

Support Nicole & Joseph website:

Imprisoned ‘Guantanamo Diary’ Author Granted Periodic Review Board Hearing

[New York, NY]  The American Civil Liberties Union announced today that a Periodic Review Board hearing has been scheduled for June 2 to review the detention of Guantánamo prisoner Mohamedou Ould Slahi.

Slahi’s deeply personal memoir, “Guantánamo Diary,” climbed to the top of The New York Times bestseller list last year and has been translated and published in more than 25 countries. The Mauritanian citizen has been imprisoned since 2002, but the U.S. government has never charged him with a crime.

An online petition demanding Slahi’s release has gathered nearly 50,000 signatures.

“Mohamedou Slahi will finally get the hearing that President Obama ordered five years ago and that Mohamedou has sought for years, including fighting for it in court,” said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU National Security Project.“More than anything, Mohamedou wants to show the board that he poses no threat to the United States and should be allowed to return home to his family where he belongs.”


Federal Judge Shuts Down FBI’s Attempted FOIA Power Grab: Rules FBI May Not Unilaterally Invent New Exemptions

[Washington, DC]  As reported in an exclusive report by Sam Thielman for The Guardian, a team of expert FOIA requestors and their attorneys has scored a major Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) victory against the FBI. This victory has three key parts: i) The FBI must release documents about FBI FOIA searches; ii) The FBI may not unilaterally invent new FOIA exemptions, and iii) The FBI may not unilaterally decide which Bureau documents do and do not have value to the public.

Shapiro FOIA

The FBI has long been notorious for the frequent poverty of the document searches it performs in response to FOIA requests. The consistent inadequacy of the FBI’s FOIA searches has even led to the Bureau receiving an “award” for “worst Freedom of Information Act performance by a federal agency” from a leading open government group, as well as a declaration from the Associated Press that, “If information were a river, the FBI would be a dam.”

In order to document and challenge the FBI’s deficient FOIA search practices, the plaintiffs in this case, including MIT’s Ryan Shapiro, submitted FOIA requests to the FBI for documents about the FBI’s processing of specific FOIA requests. The FBI refused to release the requested documents, asserting the Bureau has a blanket policy against releasing documents about FBI FOIA searches unless those searches occurred over 25 years ago. The plaintiffs filed suit to challenge this policy. As Judge Randolph D. Moss (U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia) summarized in his recent ruling, “This is, in short, a case about how the FBI applies FOIA to FOIA.” As Judge Moss also made clear in his ruling, the FBI’s policy is “fundamentally at odds” with FOIA.

No New Animal Lab Fights Back Against Skanska Injunction with Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Strike

[Hillsboro, OR] On January 29th, No New Animal Lab, with representation from the Civil Liberties Defense Center, filed an anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Strike against injunctions filed on behalf of two executives of Skanska USA. Skanska and its key decision makers have been the subject of a year-long protest campaign, organized under the banner of No New Animal Lab, for their $90 million contract to build a large, underground animal research lab for the University of Washington (UW).

NNAL Skanska Home Protest

Skanska executives at the corporation’s Portland office filed for injunctions against four activists and “No New Animal Lab” in an attempt to stifle the growing national protests. Such lawsuits are known as “SLAPPs” (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) and are often used by corporations against protest movements in an attempt to chill dissent and disrupt campaign organizing. Rather than outright criminalizing protest activity, corporations attempt to exploit the legal system, dragging grassroots activists through frivolous civil court proceedings and draining and redirecting both time and material resources. SLAPPs exist to shrewdly muzzle movements that seek to hold corporations and their executives accountable and are backdoor attempts to legislate unreasonable restrictions upon First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly.

#LoveTrumpsEverything on Eve of GOP Debate as Carolinians Gather for Vigil at Mosque to Counter Xenophobic Rhetoric

[Charleston, SC]  Local Carolinians will hold a candlelight prayer vigil at the Central Mosque of Charleston {1082 King St, Charleston, SC} to pray for the GOP Presidential hopefuls on the eve of the debate. The group, comprised of members of South Carolina’s queer, muslim, christian, women’s rights, and latino communities, will gather at 5:45pm to pray for them to “know, experience and share God’s love rather than human hate, greed and hostility.”

“We come from different faith traditions, but we all recognize love and compassion as key tenants of our respective faiths,” said Pastor Thomas Dixon. “Today, we pray for the candidate’s running for President, that God will protect them and show them the way to encourage love, compassion and community and to reject hate, prejudice, violence and greed.”