Jeremy Hammond Pleads Guilty to Stratfor Leak, Faces Harsh Sentence for Online Protest: Press Release & Jeremy’s Statement

[New York, NY]  In federal court this morning, Internet activist Jeremy Hammond pleaded guilty to publicizing internal emails from the private intelligence firm Stratfor through Wikileaks.

Icelandic Parliamentarian Birgitta Jonsdottir reads a message of solidarity to Jeremy Hammond outside of the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City 

Hammond pleaded guilty as part of a non-cooperating plea agreement to one violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which carries up to ten years in prison.  A sentencing hearing has been scheduled for September 6, 2013.  He has been jailed for 15 months without bail at the Manhattan Correctional Center in New York City, has been denied family visits, and held for weeks in solitary confinement.

“Jeremy has taken responsibility for what he’s done, but he should not face such a harsh sentence for an act of protest from which he did not personally benefit,” said Hammond’s twin brother, Jason Hammond. “I’m glad he’s moved one step closer to freedom but today I’m asking for the judge to consider a sentence appropriate to what is nothing other than a non-violent political protest.”

Jason Hammond is circulating an online petition calling for Jeremy to be sentenced to time served and released.  You can read & sign the petition at Change.org HERE.

The Stratfor leak was carried out by the online activist group LulzSec, an off-shoot of Anonymous, with the participation of an FBI informant.

The Stratfor emails provided an important source for journalists, spurring articles in dozens of major news outlets around the world. Included among the leaked internal documents were millions of emails that exposed Stratfor’s wide-ranging spying activities, including surveillance of Bhopal activists at the behest of Dow Chemical, of PETA on behalf of Coca-Cola, and of Occupy Wall Street under contract to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

“Corporate-government surveillance is one of the most rapidly expanding threats to civil liberties today,” said Abi Hassen, mass defense coordinator for the National Lawyers Guild. “The Stratfor leak is a glimpse into a secret world of corporate spying that is incompatible with this country’s democratic values. Today’s hearing should be a springboard for further investigation of Stratfor, not an opportunity to condemn a young man to a decade in prison for his political activism.”

On May 14, three British Internet activists received prison sentences of two years to 32 months for their involvement in LulzSec leaks. All three are likely to be released on parole after serving half of their sentences. A fourth is free on a suspended sentence, as are two Irish men whom prosecutors declined to charge

A STATEMENT FROM JEREMY HAMMOND REGARDING HIS PLEA AGREEMENT

May 28, 2013

Today I pleaded guilty to one count of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. This was a very difficult decision. I hope this statement will explain my reasoning. I believe in the power of the truth. In keeping with that, I do not want to hide what I did or to shy away from my actions. This non-cooperating plea agreement frees me to tell the world what I did and why, without exposing any tactics or information to the government and without jeopardizing the lives and well-being of other activists on and offline.

During the past 15 months I have been relatively quiet about the specifics of my case as I worked with my lawyers to review the discovery and figure out the best legal strategy. There were numerous problems with the government’s case, including the credibility of FBI informant Hector Monsegur. However, because prosecutors stacked the charges with inflated damages figures, I was looking at a sentencing guideline range of over 30 years if I lost at trial. I have wonderful lawyers and an amazing community of people on the outside who support me. None of that changes the fact that I was likely to lose at trial. But, even if I was found not guilty at trial, the government claimed that there were eight other outstanding indictments against me from jurisdictions scattered throughout the country. If I had won this trial I would likely have been shipped across the country to face new but similar charges in a different district. The process might have repeated indefinitely. Ultimately I decided that the most practical route was to accept this plea with a maximum of a ten year sentence and immunity from prosecution in every federal court.

Now that I have pleaded guilty it is a relief to be able to say that I did work with Anonymous to hack Stratfor, among other websites. Those others included military and police equipment suppliers, private intelligence and information security firms, and law enforcement agencies. I did this because I believe people have a right to know what governments and corporations are doing behind closed doors. I did what I believe is right.

I have already spent 15 months in prison. For several weeks of that time I have been held in solitary confinement. I have been denied visits and phone calls with my family and friends. This plea agreement spares me, my family, and my community a repeat of this grinding process.

I would like to thank all of my friends and supporters for their amazing and ongoing gestures of solidarity. Today I am glad to shoulder the responsibility for my actions and to move one step closer to daylight.

Jeremy Hammond

twitterjump

The Jeremy Hammond Defense Committee is a coalition of family members, activists, lawyers, and other supporters who are working together to protect free speech and to support Jeremy Hammond. For more information about the case and Jeremy Hammond, visit www.freejeremy.net

Comments

7 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.
  1. Christopher Czechowicz,

    For the freedom of information.

  2. Jeffrey Field,

    Free speech isn’t free.

  3. “Assault by Lawyer”.

    please could someone get word to this guy that if he has a recording or any kind of record of that conversation that said “if you lose this trial we will take you to court again and again” that that is actually a CRIMINAL OFFENSE in the United States. it’s an official criminal offense known as “Assault by Lawyer”.

    in other words, his legal team should report it as a criminal offense. i believe that may help throw a spanner in the works.

  4. Sorry,

    Stealing secrets to publicize wrongdoing is a protected crime

  5. Lobo the Duck,

    Sorry. But Hammond SHOULD suffer for his offense.
    He’s now a repeat offender. He went to jail for 2 years for an almost identical offense back in 2007.

    He apparently didn’t learn.

    Whether or not he saw benefit from his criminal actions is irrelevant. Don’t do the crime if you don’t want to do the time.

    That and the fact that the entire thing was solely so he could stroke his own ego. All he had to do to avoid being caught was just NOT say anything about his past. But he had to brag.

    Jeremy doesn’t need lenience here. He needs tough love. An extensive sentence, commensurate with being a repeat offender. And some intensive psychological therapy while he’s in. Otherwise, he’ll get out and then self destruct again in a couple years.

    As much as I dislike the man (having dealt with him personally), he doesn’t deserve that. He needs help and the correctional institutes in this country owe him that remediation.

    • Wendy,

      If you believe in what you’re doing, what’s to “learn” except that it was worth the consequences? The Stratfor Group is clearly a company that needs to be spied on, and if has to take some jail time to put some reins on their amoral schemes, then I’m glad there’s someone brave enough to do it. Anybody who thinks this is for “stroking an ego” clearly is blind to the public benefit of these public exposures.

      So, just to be clear: Letting people know that they were being spied on in the past is a worse crime in the eyes of the law than raping someone. Think about that.

  6. R. Jensen,

    No-one should EVER be bothered (much less put into solitary confinement and kept from the solace of his family) for making people aware of a corrupt government! Then they still threaten him further, that if he doesn’t “obey”, they’ll grind him down some more? As someone said, rape, murder, kill, that’s O.K. with us, but don’t make anything available that interferes with our Public Image. You’ll go to jail for that forever! Hmmm? What’s wrong with that picture! Even in England, where activists like that (our voice) get off much more easily, they shouldn’t punish them at all! What kind of democracy do we have indeed as long as this kind of perverse behavior by officials is going on? And then to get a judge who is part of this rats-nest! Oh no! Set him free. He’s suffered enough for doing nothing wrong!

Add Your Comments

Disclaimer
Your email is never published nor shared.
Required
Required
Tips

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <ol> <ul> <li> <strong>

Ready?

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree